Journal Entry #8 - Facing Fake News
The amount of information that is given in the photograph leads to many questions towards its credibility. The photograph shows the deformed flowers but, the information that accompanies the photograph is not enough to back up the photo. There could be speculation that the photograph was photoshopped. This could be a subject of fake news. There are no scientific facts that back up the photographs reasoning. There also are no other references/sources other than the photo itself. The evidence provided does not seem to be strong enough to be believable. Although the photo evidence is a strong point, there is just not enough extra information to back it up. Questions that immediately rise in my mind are, "are the grounds safe enough to walk on, only years after the nuclear disaster?". There is too many loose ends to immediately trust the article. To verify this claim, I would go into a deep research. I would find sources that are involved on sight and have a knowledge of the ma